Homeless Prevention Funding
 
Written by Nana Oppong, on December 08, 2009

Washington Legal Cinic for the Homeless' response to the WAMU 88.5 report on Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Program.

The Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless ("WLCH") believes that every human being has a right to housing.  We applaud any efforts by Mayor Fenty or President Obama to prevent homelessness by keeping people in their homes and to end homelessness by increasing access to affordable, permanent housing.  WAMU misconstrued our position for their first story on the Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Program ("HPRP") funding, which ran the morning of December 1st.  Our concern, which is taken out of context in the WAMU story, is that life-saving shelter not be reduced below the need while the homeless services system is transitioning from a shelter-based system to one rooted in permanent housing.


Despite the laudable efforts and significant funding the Fenty administration has put towards increasing access to affordable housing for chronically homeless individuals and families, the District still has 26,000 households on the waitlist for subsidized housing, including 13,000 who are homeless.  As the Urban Institute noted in its 2009 Housing in the Nation's Capital report, "without significant increases, subsidized housing will not fill the gap" in housing affordability and stem the tide of those in need of shelter.  Moreover, due to the economy, homelessness - especially amongst families - is rising at a very precipitous rate (by 20% during the period of January 2008 to January 2009).  Over the past several months the family emergency shelter system has been at capacity with - for the first time ever - over 400 families on the waiting list for emergency shelter.  The HPRP funds will help ease this crisis by preventing more families from falling into homelessness, and WLCH welcomes this funding wholeheartedly.  In addition to this funding, however, more resources need to be identified and dedicated to the homeless services safety net - including shelter - so that the District can ensure that no family has to sleep outside on a cold fall night.  We look forward to - and commit ourselves to working towards - the day when shelters can be closed because enough affordable housing and prevention funds exist to help all families in need; unfortunately that day is still far off.

We have, over the years, been dismissed as "emergency shelter zealots," and unfortunately, WAMU's characterization of Marta's remarks feeds that misconception.  The reality is that we have worked with families over the last few months who have spent nights sleeping outdoors at the Rhode Island Avenue metro station (across the street from the shelter intake office); in laundromats, vans, and in other dangerous or abusive situations, because they were refused admission to shelter for lack of space.  Our position is that the shelter safety net must remain intact in some capacity unless or until there is adequate and immediately available permanent housing for each family who needs it.  Hopefully, having new resources like HPRP funds will mean that the safety net can ultimately be downsized, but not until fewer families find themselves falling off of the cliff into homelessness.


 The Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless works to end the unnecessary suffering caused by poverty and advocates for justice for people who are homeless or at-risk of becoming homeless in Washington, DC.

 



Readers' Comments (1)

Posted by John Steinsvold, on March 09, 2010
An Alternative to Capitalism (which will end homelessness) 
 
The following link takes you to an essay titled: "Home of the Brave?" which was published by the Athenaeum Library of Philosophy:  
 
http://evans- experientialism.freewebspace.c om/steinsvold.htm  
 
John Steinsvold
 

Add your comment



mXcomment 1.0.6 © 2007-2010 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved