On Communications
 
Written by Eduardo Romero, on January 24, 2008

megaphone.jpgIn a December exit interview, Ford Foundation’s Susan Berresford said nonprofits “need to do a much better job than we have done so far talking about what our sector does, what its shape and size is, what its issues are, and what its value is,” according to the Chronicle of Philanthropy. Though some are better communicators than others, nonprofit leaders individually and collectively have to constantly improve our communications skill set. 

Communication is a vital part of the Roundtable’s work: how well we communicate with Members, among staff, with the media, with policy makers determines the success of our work.  This is nothing new to any nonprofit – effective communication with Boards, clients, volunteers, and of course, those ever present funders, is a daily demand.  How nonprofits could/should do this has generated a maze of books, organizations, and, of course, blogs

In 2007 the Roundtable experimented (rather loosely) with different types of communication including:

Facebook and LinkedIn: This has been more an individual staff effort but it seems to have more (unknown) potential – particularly Facebook.  For example, several Members have ‘Facebook Cause’ pages including CentroNia, DC Vote, Martha’s Table, and Impact Silver Spring which can lead to stronger communication.  My letter to the editor in the Washington Business Journal confesses my personal confusion about these ‘social networking’ tools in response to their recent editorial.
- The Roundtable’s wiki (you may need this password: ‘nonprofit!’):  We tried using a wiki for a conversation on collective leadership.  It was not a raging success - I suspect maybe six people clicked onto it and one participant added a comment (yeah Susan!).  We may give it another try – based on what we learned.  For a much better example, see this wiki on a nonprofit bootcamp.
Polling on Events: Our Communication Directors’ Table for Ten tried using a poll to determine what our next event would be on – about 50% of the group voted – and as a result, on February 21, we will have a lunch with an editor of WashingtonPost.com.  (Communication/Marketing staff of Member organizations are welcome!)

It may be an auspicious time to get a blog going:  ‘Bloggers Say Stress of Posting Is a Hazard to Their Health’ headlined the New York Times; and earlier this month, the Whitehouse blogged into action.  

In the spirit of interactivity, let me know or comment below how you might finish some of these sentences:
- Blogs are ____________.
- My favorite blogs include _________.
- I would like to blog about ______________.

Here are some of my answers:
- Blogs are largely entertaining but can be informational.
- My favorites include the Bivings Report and the Chronicle of Philanthropy’s blog roundup.
- I would like to blog about how Roundtable Members define leadership


Readers' Comments (8)

Posted by Michael Maranda, on January 28, 2008
The important point on communications here is communicating and thinking like a field. Perhaps a meta-field, a field of fields. Communications are types of flows... are our communications effective? Are we building net value for our society as a result of our efforts? How can we be more strategic in leveraging our communication within organizations, between organizations, and within specialties: issue and functional, and within geographies? 
 
A blog is just a tool. You get out of blogging what you put into it - which means be discerning about what you read, but dont be too exclusive.
 

Posted by Michael Maranda, on January 28, 2008
gifthub.org offers excellent Transformative/Philanthropy 2.0 discourse.
 

Posted by MCiello, on January 29, 2008
I found the previous commentors remarks confusing. I think part of good communications is making sure that we do not speak in sector specific jargon, but try and simplify as much as possible. If we can communicate with clarity and precision in such a way that the average person can understand then you have something!
 

Posted by Michael Maranda, on January 29, 2008
Not clear what elements were jargon? "Field"? Meta-Field? Flow? Commons?
 

Posted by Bill Wright, on January 29, 2008
It's great that Eduardo has brought up is discussing about when blogs, wikis, and so on are the best use of the limited time we all have. This fall I saw a really good presentation by Victor d'Allant of the Skoll Foundation's Social Edge about the topic, which is available here: http://www.comnetwork.org/ Fall_2007_Annual_Conference_Pr esentations.htm. Scroll to the bottom of the page to see his slides. There's only a limited amount of his commentary, but there are some good examples.
 

More comments...

Add your comment



mXcomment 1.0.6 © 2007-2008 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved